Storing Hydrogen in Baked Chicken Feathers
June 25th, 2009 by AndrewI couldn’t have made this story up if I wanted to.
While hydrogen was once the poster-child for the sustainable economy, now that the true magnitude of the costs and challenges associated with bringing it to fruition became apparent, it has largely been left in the dust by batteries. However, there are still plenty of H2-stalwarts researching technologies that could help bring the costs of portable energy into line for that distant, gas-free future we all dream of.
From ecogeek:
Scientists at the University of Delaware have come up with a new hydrogen storage solution: chicken feathers. Well, carbonized chicken feather fibers to be exact. What’s more, their discovery meets the ambitious hydrogen storage targets set by the DOE for 2010 and 2015, which call for great storage capacity at a low cost.
Chicken feather fibers are made of keratin, a protein that forms strong, hollow tubes. The scientists heated the chicken feathers until hollow carbon microtubes formed with nanoporous walls and the fibers’ surface area increased. The resulting carbonized chicken feather fibers allow the storage of as much, or more, hydrogen than carbon nanotubes or metal hydrides, other materials that have been found to store hydrogen well.
The big success here is that making carbonized chicken feather storage tanks is far less costly than producing storage tanks made of the other materials. A 20-gallon carbon nanotube tank would cost $5.5 million to produce, while the same size tank made with metal hydrides would cost $30,000. Comparitively, a carbonized chicken feather tank would run about $200.
The scientists estimate that a car would require a 75-gallon tank using this material in order to have a range of 300 miles. They are working now to increase that range.
July 1st, 2009 at 2:20 am
Good lord.
This is another one of those things that is liable to throw veggie-environmentalists for a loop. Is it right to raise chickens (and steal their feathers, and probably later kill and eat them) if it means we can stop the planet from overheating? (Of course, there’s still a lot of other issues with hydrogen - I think extraction is probably a major one.)
The other example I’m thinking of is livestock like cattle– grain fed feedlot cows are, of course, completely terrible for the environment. But from what I’ve heard, pasture-fed cows cows that are heavily “rotated” actually build a great deal of topsoil (one of many major problems facing much of the planet right now), which also sequesters a lot of carbon. Properly raised, cows can be carbon negative.