The “essential” debate lingers on…
May 6th, 2008 by AndyIs the TTC an essential service? A lot of people do depend on it to get to work, school, wherever they need to go - and the city does shut down when no buses are running - but no, fuck no, it is not essential. I’m sick of people thinking the world revolves around them and freaking out any time they are inconvenienced. The fire department, ambulances, and the police are essential. That’s it. No one dies when the TTC stops, everyone just gets a day (or a few) off. What’s the big deal? Remember when there was a movement to make teachers “essential” and stop them from striking, because missing a week of school would jeopardize their futures? Come on… no one is actually hurt by these things. Or maybe I just don’t understand - why do people get so pissed off when there’s a transit strike? These same people were rejoicing during the blackout of 2003, and the subway was stopped then too.
(I’m don’t want to be misunderstood as arguing that transit is not essential for a healthy city, just as teachers or even restaurateurs and artists are also essential for a vibrant community. This is a very different essential from what “essential service” legislation is getting at)
May 6th, 2008 at 9:52 pm
The economic hit to the city is pretty significant, but that alone doesn’t do it for me. I think part of the crux of the issue is that (as with most things) the people who get hit hardest by a transit strike are those who can least afford it.
If you’re the dude who can’t take the bus to your two minimum-wage jobs, you get screwed a lot harder than the white-collar worker who drives to the office instead, gets an excuse to work from home, or just fucks off for the day.