Grabbing the low hanging fruit, or just wasting time?

September 14th, 2008 by Andy

Toronto city council is now actively looking for a way to do something about all the fast food waste (mainly coffee cups) that we’re so happy to produce.  Strategies proposed so far include a tax, a deposit system, or an outright ban on the garbage.

It seems to me that the only good solution of those three is the ban.  While a tax may make the city some cash, paying an extra dime or so for a cup of coffee is not going to encourage people to bring reusable mugs - it will just enrage people and get them mad at environmentalism I think.  A deposit system would probably be better at keeping the streets clean, thanks to our enterprising hordes of homeless folk, but also doesn’t really help tackle the core issue.  We make too much garbage.  However, I can’t really imagine the logistics of a ban - do you always have to have a mug with you?  I try my best to carry one around, but getting a bite/a drink is often an impulse decision, and if we want to encourage people walking/cycling around instead of driving, it doesn’t seem reasonable to demand people carry around all this extra “what if” shit.  I don’t know if this would work that well.

The University of Guelph has also tried to find a solution to this problem, and I quite like it.  It almost falls into the tax category, but instead of charging you more to get a disposable cup, all the coffee outlets charge the price of a small coffee to fill a mug, which are usually bigger than the large sizes.  And there, a ridiculously large number of people carry reusable mugs.

Blah.  That wasn’t supposed to be what this rant was about.  When tackling any big problem (i.e. environmental degradation), it only makes sense to grab the low hanging fruit first - solve the easy problems that would have the biggest impact to start, and then work towards the more complicated solutions.  The city of Toronto seems eager to be a leader in the sustainability movement, but I often wonder if our priorities are a bit out of whack.  Is spending what will probably be months of council’s time debating ways to reduce the amount of coffee garbage we produce really giving us the best bang for our buck?  Wouldn’t it make more sense to tackle to big issues that will have a huge impact?  What about building new subways, streetcar lanes, or bike paths?  Toronto promised a measly 50km of new bike paths this year.  They’re not going to come anywhere close to that laughable goal even.  This coffee cup issue, while definitely legit, seems like a bit of a distraction from much bigger problems with solutions not hanging much further up the tree.

Similar Posts

2 Responses to “Grabbing the low hanging fruit, or just wasting time?”

  1. Andrew Says:

    Subways and streetcars are huge, but they’re hardly low-hanging fruit - they are multi-million (potentially billion) dollar megaprojects that take a tremendously long time to legislate and implement.

    The city’s lack of commitment to bike lanes, on the other hand, is an absolute travesty. If introducing new bike lanes means increasing car congestion, it seems like a win-win to me. When you take away the incentive to drive, and increase the incentive to bike, you’re going to spur change - and it’s not like you’re penalizing people without providing a valid alternative.

    I know when I had bike lanes to commute to work, it was the easiest thing in the world. Now I need to constantly worry about being doored, and that risk is more than most people are willing to take.

    (in closing, I think a deposit on coffee cups is a good idea. In fact, a deposit on everything is probably a good idea. Manufacturers need to be responsible for the waste they generate - until we’re working in closed-loop systems, they are the ones best suited to tackling the problem. Dell and I think a few other manufacturers have started taking back computers for free, so there’s some progress being made)

  2. kevin Says:

    travesty indeed… bike lanes are an absolute must in toronto, i grip the handlebars way too hard (out of fear) most of the time i ride without them. the pro-bike lane BECAUSE of extra congestion argument sounds like a good one, but i think you’d have a hard time convincing the majority of that. seriously though, this city is as flat as any, and because of the weather offers a pretty decent bike season in length. not only that, but people do like to ride here, and so, so many don’t own cars downtown… so yeah, how are there not lanes EVERYWHERE by now?

Leave a Reply